Part I: Due: Sunday
May 19
What are Jackson’s arguments in support of the charter of
London?
What are Wyzanki’s arguments against the legality of the
charter?
Part II: Due Sunday
May 19
In January 2005, Army Spc. Charles
Graner Jr., who grinned in photos of Iraqi prisoners being sexually humiliated
but told jurors, “I didn’t enjoy what I did there,” was sentenced to 10 years
behind bars in the first court-martial stemming from the Abu Ghraib prison
scandal. Graner, labeled the leader of a band of rogue guards at the Baghdad
prison in late 2003, could have received 15 years. Asked if he felt remorse
after the sentence was handed down, Graner said, “There’s a war on. Bad things
happen.” Graner will be dishonorably discharged when his sentence is completed.
He also was demoted to private and ordered to forfeit all pay and benefits.
Graner was accused of stacking naked prisoners in a human pyramid and later ordering
them to masturbate while other soldiers took photographs. He also allegedly
punched one man in the head hard enough to knock him out, and struck an injured
prisoner with a collapsible metal stick. Graner did not testify during his
trial, but during the sentencing phase he took the witness stand to repeat the
defense claim that the jury clearly rejected: that he had been ordered by
intelligence agents at Abu Ghraib to abuse the prisoners to make them easier to
interrogate. He said he initially resisted pressure to mistreat prisoners, but
his Army superiors made it clear to him that he was expected to obey the
commands of the military and civilian intelligence agents who ran his part of
Abu Ghraib. Graner said a lieutenant in his unit told him: “If (military
intelligence) asks you to do this, it needs to be done. They’re in charge,
follow their orders.” He said he now knows that those orders were unlawful, but
“at the time my understanding is that they were (lawful), or I wouldn’t have
done them,” he said. Do you agree with the sentence or do you think there was
any merit to his defense that he was following orders?
Part III: Wednesday
May 22
Please comment on two of your classmates’ responses to the
Abu Ghraib case.
No comments:
Post a Comment